fine again here this with all the accounting flow many
impacts. Well Friday, March 19, 2010
Testing Water To Antifreeze Ratio
deductible expenses for purposes of IR - Part 2
fine again here this with all the accounting flow many
impacts. Well
fine again here this with all the accounting flow many
impacts. Well return to the subject on deductible expenses. 
In principle there is also the "causality" normal and reasonable (whattt say some guys) that is, it really has to do with the bussiness, ok. Now there are some expenses may be deductible in principle but require compliance with a specific rule to the end of the year failed to comply, then we'll handle a deferred umo (ohhhhh).
There goes one case, for example, SAA FINE BATERIA company had in its inventory merchandise by 10.000. These goods suffered a decline of 1.000 but there were no technical report that accredited its low thus accounting accounting provision was made but no tax would be accepted in the annual declaration. There comes a time difference ARE OR ARE NOT BATTERY (yess puess).
Another case is when a theft of goods, accounting 
give him low but acceptable for tax purposes has to be sentenced by a judge why some might say? The answer is that through this way you can prove that the theft has been caused by third parties and not due to the preparation by the company.
give him low but acceptable for tax purposes has to be sentenced by a judge why some might say? The answer is that through this way you can prove that the theft has been caused by third parties and not due to the preparation by the company. Another example is the fine that puts us that is not acceptable SUNAT as a deduction, less any default interest or any penalty because the taxpayer. This issue of the penalty is clear, if the company pays for cavalierly failed in his duty does not meet the causation and would not be deductible.
continue our contributions as IS IMPOSSIBLE TO STOP .
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment